Professional connections and public relations in Early Childhood

Monday, May 3, 2021

Scholar Practitioners Who Impact Future Change

 

As a scholar-practitioner in the early childhood field, it is my responsibility to inspire learning and contribute to the health and the well-being of children and families. Knowing that success comes through partnerships with parents and community I can maximize my abilities to meet the emerging needs of children, families, and communities by continuing my education and leading evaluation initiatives.

My greatest barrier to avoid when leading program evaluations is including all stakeholders. I tend to take the lead and fail to delegate; causing missed opportunities to grow from other people’s expertise. By working collaboratively with all stakeholders the valuable work we are doing is not “hampered by organizational fragmentation, infrastructure gaps, and inadequate tools and methods” (National Early Childhood Accountability Task Force (2013, p. 11).

To ensure that evaluations are effective I must work collaboratively with other state and local agencies within our unified and coherent system of standards, assessments, data, and professional development efforts to help design and implement an effective evaluation system or utilize the QRIS system that is in place to help strengthen early childhood education with well qualified educators, developmentally appropriate curriculum, and adequate learning time (National Early Childhood Accountability Task Force, 2013). As our country moves closer to an early childhood system of universal preschool perhaps this collaboration can take place on a national level.

 

Reference:

National Early Childhood Accountability Task Force. (2013). The report of the National Early Childhood Accountability Task Force: Taking Stock: Assessing and improving early childhood learning and program quality. Retrieved from: http://policyforchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Taking-Stock.pdf

Saturday, May 1, 2021

Using Assistive Technology to Aide in Assessment

 

In early childhood education, our goal is to teach children independence and how to interact with their peers and environment, that is why assistive technology is important. There are tools that can help children with differing abilities build skills in areas they may be struggling in, these tools are known as assistive technology. Assistive technology can help with almost any skill and can be used by children from infancy to secondary education. By using assistive technology daily routines and activities become easier and children can achieve independence (Nielsen, 2011).

 

Two assistive and supportive technologies that can be used in an early childhood setting are visual systems and noise-blocking headphones. Customized to the child’s individual needs a visual system displaying the daily routine can help preschool and school-aged children with autism anticipate what comes next, be prepared for transitions, and keep on track. Visual systems are also great for helping children communicate their needs if they are non-verbal or have trouble with speech (Nielsen, 2011).


 

Even though it is a simple technology noise-blocking headphones can be very helpful for children (preschool – secondary education) with sensory processing disorders. Noise canceling headphones can increase focus and help small children so they do not become overwhelmed by sensory input (Pacer Center, Inc., 2015).


 To be culturally and developmentally appropriate assistive technology should be individualized based on a child’s needs. When used with assessments assistive technology can help make understanding and practicing daily tasks easier and more engaging for children with differing abilities (Pacer Center, Inc., 2015).

 

References:

Nielsen, L. (2011). 25 incredible assistive technologies. Retrieved from http://theinnovativeeducator.blogspot.com/2011/09/25-incredible-assistive-technologies.html

Pacer Center, Inc.  (2015).  Examples of assistive technology for young children.  Pacer.org.  https://www.pacer.org/stc/pubs/STC-29.pdf

 

Thursday, April 22, 2021

Choosing the proper assessment scenario:

Purposeful assessment practices help teachers and students of all ages to understand where they are at in each developmental domain, what they have already learned, and what they need to learn next (Banerjee & Luckner, 2013). All children learn in different way’s but being knowledgeable in regards to developmental milestones and having background information on assessments that can be used for various age groups with differing abilities can be very beneficial to inform instruction when individualizing and planning. In this blog, I am going to provide you with two scenarios where assessment is need. The two children are from different age groups; therefore, they will be in different stages of development. Please read through the scenarios and see if you can suggest an assessment that would be beneficial to advance their learning.

Timmy is 4 years old enrolled in a half-day Head Start preschool classroom in the afternoon. Timmy only uses a few words and screams when he is upset. Mike has had a hearing test and it is fine. Prior to preschool, Timmy’s mom thought this was normal behavior for his age. Timmy lives in a homeless shelter with his mom and 3-month old sister so he spends a lot of time in his car seat watching his mom's phone. Timmy’s teacher wants to get a baseline assessment but Timmy has very few words and he does not know how to communicate besides screaming. Mom is tired, scared, and frustrated, and not sure what to do next. What assessments should this teacher perform?

Becky is starting 3rd grade. Becky used to love coming to school but now she cries when it is time to leave for school and is starting to act out in class, trying to get the other students to laugh at her. Last week Becky looked like she was taking her spelling test on Friday but when she turned it in she had drawn little pictures on each line. Becky refuses to do her homework and insists that she be allowed to "read in her head." Becky's class has a reading competition where if the students read 100 books and pass the STARS test (reading comprehension) they get to have a pizza party but everyone has to participate. During reading group, Becky said her eyes hurt could someone please read out loud. When she took the test she passed. Becky had her eyes checked a month ago and her vision is perfect. Last year Becky passed reading, spelling, and literacy but this year she is currently at a first-grade level. What assessments would you use to determine how to help Becky?

 

References

Banerjee, R., & Luckner, J. (2013). Assessment Practices and Training Needs of Early Childhood Professionals. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(3), 231–248. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/10901027.2013.816808


Tuesday, March 9, 2021

 

Blog: Scholar Practitioners as Program Evaluators

 

When I started thinking more about program evaluation and assessment I started viewing myself as a scholar practitioner, this is one way that this course is already having an impact on what I want to do and who I want to become in the field of early childhood education. Listening to other mentors and scholar practitioners reflect on the process of evaluating and assessing programs for certification it helped me to realize that every step I have taken on my professional and educational journey has been shaping me and increasing my professional effectiveness.

Our Head Start program is currently at the end of a 5-year grant. I am learning that an important part of program evaluation is self-assessment. Self-assessment is all inclusive (Administration for Children and Families (2018). It is not just administrators, it is teacher’s, food service workers, maintenance, fiscal, enrollment, and IT. As an agency we had a 4 hour all staff meeting last week where we conducted data carousel’s. As small groups (10 or less) we discussed our staff survey, parent survey, and outcome results. We asked 3 questions what we are doing right, what we are doing wrong and what we can do to improve. These questions will help to shape our program goals and help to ensure we are aligning our mission, vision and program standards.

In this process and through the learning materials I have realized that teaching staff who are directly implementing the curriculum and evaluating progress need to be equipped to gather and analyze data. As a high quality preschool program it is important that everyone is involved and you are setting timelines, action steps and following through for program evaluation to work effectively.

References:

Administration for Children and Families (2018). Voices from the Field: Plan to Succeed – Developing and Sustaining. Retrieved from: https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/video/voices-field-plan-succeed-developing-sustaining

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/file/naeyc/file/positions/CAPEexpand.pdf

EDDD 8083/EDSD 7083: Assessment Practices to Promote Healthy Development and Learning. Assignment: Blog: Policies and National Regulations and Standards for Early Childhood Education

 

·        Summarize your state’s policies and standards for Early Childhood Education. Link the source of your information. 

 

In the state of Washington our state’s policies and standards for Early Childhood Education is a QRIS system called Early Achievers. Early Achievers using a house framework, incorporates professional development and training, mentoring, planning, communities of practice, professional development and training, engaging interactions and environments, family engagement and partnership, curriculum and learning opportunities, screening and ongoing child assessment in collaboration with families into one comprehensive system of program quality standards.

Our Early Achievers standards and expectations were designed to align with Head Start and ECEAP Performance Standards. ECEAP refers to the Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program, Washington’s pre-kindergarten program for low income 3 and 4 year olds and their families. The rating system provides information about the quality of early learning programs so families can feel confident about their early learning choices for their child/children. Early learning professionals are continuously building on the skills they develop through Early Achievers. Their participation demonstrates a commitment to improving quality of education for children. Early Achievers uses a rating system to help families understand their provider’s progress in quality improvement.



https://www.dcyf.wa.gov/services/earlylearning-childcare/early-achievers/rating-system

 

·        Compare and contrast these policies with NAEYC principles of child development and learning that inform practice and NBPTS Standard V. Include your suggestions for improvement.

 


Early Achievers is closely aligned with NAEYC principles of child development and learning. Level 5 of Early Achievers includes National Accreditation. The Early Achievers Quality Standards focus on achieving positive outcomes for every child a facility serves, utilizing five quality standards areas much like the five core propositions outlined in the NBPTS Standards.
Having participated in Early Achievers for over 5 years I know that the quality standard areas help providers strive for high quality early childhood education for every child but are challenging to achieve, depending on the curriculum that is implemented. Each curriculum comes with its own assessment tools and can be misaligned and contradict each other. For example, Early Achievers uses The CLASS tool and ERS to asses’ programs while High Scope certified programs uses the PQA tool. The environment’s section for the PQA does not align with the ECERS-3.

 


Generate three questions for guests to answer based on your state’s policies on assessment and your readings for this module.

1)    Why is it important to complete a strengthening families’ self-assessment as part of your quality rating system?

2)    Why is it important to align your curriculum with best practice and your QRIS system?

3)    Why should programs use a developmental screening tool that is valid and reliable?

 

·        Cite at least three sources from the Learning Resources and a minimum of two additional sources from your own research to substantiate your thinking. Note: The resources should be in APA format.

 

Bagnato, S. J., McLean, M., Macy, M., & Neisworth, J. T. (2011). Identifying Instructional Targets for Early Childhood via Authentic Assessment: Alignment of Professional Standards and Practice-Based Evidence. Journal of Early Intervention33(4), 243–253. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1177/1053815111427565

 National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2003). Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/file/naeyc/file/positions/CAPEexpand.pdf

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (2012). Early childhood generalist’s standards (3rd ed.). http://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/EC-GEN.pdf

National Center on Early Childhood Quality Assurance: QRS Resource Guide (2018). Retrieved from https://ecquality.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/1812_Section_7_Data_Evaluation_FINAL.pdf

 WaKIDS: The Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills (WaKIDS) is our state’s kindergarten readiness process (2020). www.k12.wa.us/WAKIDS/ubdocs/IntroducingMe.pdf

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Meaningful Learning Experiences In Supportive Environments: A Dissertation Review



A Dissertation Review on Positive Caring Learning Environments
Susan Renee Tefft
Walden University 

Title: Preparing Early Learners for Kindergarten Success
The early childhood problem researched in the dissertation along with a brief explanation of the study—study purpose, population/participants, methodology, data sources, and conclusions
The early childhood problem that the author was researching in this dissertation was how high-quality learning environments in early childhood education can reduce disparities in academic achievement. The research in this dissertation also looked at how pre-academic skills taught during early learning can assist children with having higher educational attainment throughout schooling. The purpose of this study was to understand the significance of classroom quality as it relates to the relationship between a teacher and student, the impact of parental involvement in the school environment, and preschool teachers' understanding of process quality and structural quality.
The author of this dissertation conducted a qualitative case study at an elementary school in Texas. Utilizing a purposeful sampling of participants that included all 16 early childhood teachers and 17 parents of the early learners in that school. The school that is being used for the research had 8 classrooms with 2 teachers in each classroom and two parents were selected from each classroom to participate in the study.
The author conducted face-to-face interviews with parents and teachers utilizing preplanned questions to ensure the data collected from participants was accurate. During the interviews, an audio-recorder was used for accuracy and the data was transcribed, coded and sorted. The researcher followed extensive steps to ensure reliability and validity of the data collected.
The researcher found that high-quality learning opportunities were limited in this particular school. Possibly, because teachers’ had a lack of knowledge as it relates to structural quality and process quality. The research stated that the curriculum being used by the school was outdated and may not be reaching the individual needs of the children. The research also found that the parents lacked an understanding of the importance of social-emotional skills as they relate to school readiness. The researcher concluded that with Professional Development for teachers to increase their understanding of structural quality and process quality, an updated curriculum that individualizes instruction for children, and parent education on social-emotional development and how it relates to kindergarten readiness; high-learning opportunities and kindergarten readiness could increase.
Resources Used In This Research and Their Relevance to This Study
Below I listed three resources that I reviewed that the researcher used in this dissertation. The first resource was a research article written by several researchers and illustrated how promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness can affect later learning for school-age children. This article is relevant to this dissertation because it directly relates to the research questions the author is trying to answer.
The second is a white paper that highlights the efforts being made in Washington State to offer high-quality universal preschool and the components of a high quality early learning program. This resource would be useful to the research being done in this dissertation because the researcher needs to have a basic understanding of what the early learning professional community standards are for a high-quality early learning environment.
The third article I reviewed that was used in this research was on family engagement in early childhood programs. Recognizing the important role of the family in educational success directly relates to the problem statement being addressed in this dissertation. Therefore, the researcher would have to read and understand multiple sources of literature that relate to family involvement in early childhood education and the role the family and culture play in early childhood education.
Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M.T., & Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness: The head start REDI program. Child Development, 79(6), 1802-1817. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01227.x

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2011, April). Early learning - Washington State. Retrieved from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/What-We-Do/USProgram/Washington-State/Early-Learning

DeMeulenaere, M. (2015). Family involvement in quality early child care centers.
Childhood Education, 91(4), 315-316. doi:10.1080/00094056.2015.1069164

How the information gleaned from this dissertation may further my work related to fostering supportive learning environments through positive classroom cultures and classroom communities.
As an Education Manager in a County Head Start program part of my job is to ensure that the Teacher/Family Advocates under me have an understanding of what constitutes a supportive learning environment and how to offer every child and family a positive classroom culture and community. By staying abreast of current trends and research in the early childhood field I will be able to offer better support for my staff and more importantly, a high-quality early childhood experience for all of the children enrolled in our program.
The information and resources gathered in this dissertation are current and relevant. The researcher took an in-depth look at what an early-childhood preschool program does to support kindergarten readiness and the role the family play’s in that process. I can use this information to design professional development opportunities to support what we know and what we need to know to create a supportive learning environment for every child in our program.
This dissertation also relates directly to the research I am doing on the The social-emotional aptitude of early childhood professionals and how not providing adequate training to beginning teachers’ leads to attrition and burn out. The author of this dissertation provided research and resources that will both be valuable to my learning and my teaching to help ensure the quality of the program I work for and my research.

References:
Stewart, D. J. (2016). Preparing early learners for kindergarten success (Order No. 10090333). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1779522971). Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.proquest.com%2Fdocview%2F1779522971%3Faccou

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

My Language and Literacy Journey

Hello colleagues and friends,

I used myself as my child to write about in my research on my language and literacy journey. The reasoning behind this was I believed it would give me a closer connection to my personal journey through life and illustrate how intwined language and literacy is with everything that we do on a daily basis. Little did I know that by writing about myself I was writing about childhood traumas that have (I thought) long been buried. I think this journey has raised a lot of questions for me in regards to trauma-informed early childhood education and what it really means to be an educator and the impact it has on brain development and language and literacy development. 

When I started out I was trying to set the stage so that the reader (or listener) would be intrigued and want to learn more about this little girl named Susie who, from humble beginnings is now working on her EDD. Now, my goal has changed. My goal is to show how even children in poverty who are out-of-sync with mainstream society can learn a language and use literacy to build a bridge out of poverty, but just as importantly how teacher's can be informed; so they can be the change agent that these children need so they will have the desire, drive and motivation to achieve more. 

Part 1 Introduction: My Child in Context

Susie, a skinny female child is the subject of my research. She came from a “nuclear” family with a mother, father, 3 brothers, and 3 sisters. As a child Susie’s family had several pets. They had 3 cats, 5 dogs, guinea pigs, gerbils, and birds. Susie is the 4th child of 7.
When Susie’s mother was pregnant for her she contracted the measles during her first trimester. During the first 20 weeks of pregnancy, the disease is passed on to the unborn baby. The baby will then have congenital rubella. This can cause the baby to be born with life-long problems such as eye problems, hearing problems, and damage to the heart (retrieved from https://www.caringforkids.cps.ca/handouts/rubella_in_pregnancy). At this time her mother was caring for her 4 older siblings who were 1, 2, 7, and 9 at this time and they also contracted the measles. Susie’s father worked 12-hour shifts in a  trailer factory and turned to alcohol as a way to console himself and escape the hardships life had dealt him. He would frequently strike her mother and sometimes he would hit his children as well. Studies have shown that children who witness domestic violence can suffer from emotional and developmental delays that are similar to those of children who experience the physical abuse directly (Schecter, S., & Edelson, J. (1999).
During this time sometimes there wasn’t enough food for Susie’s mother to have adequate nutrition, but her mother would always make sure there was something for her children to eat, at least once a day, even if she went without, “malnutrition holds potential psychological and physical effects for young children” (Roseberry-McKibbin, 2012 p7.).
During the winter months, the family would heat their home with oil or kerosene whatever they could afford. Sometimes they would not have either so to keep her children and herself warm Susie’s pregnant mother would turn the oven on and open the door and all of the children could gather around to keep warm. Sometimes her grandmother, who also worked in a factory, would bring groceries and buy heating oil to help the family. During her pregnancy, Susie’s mother smoked cigarettes (about a pack a day) and consumed a lot of coffee. Cigarettes and Caffeine consumed in access during pregnancy are found to cause low birth weight which is related to impairments in expressive and receptive language development (Trelles, M.P., 2016).
As a child, Susie’s family had a small black and white television but no computers, however, they did have books. While she was pregnant for her, Susie’s mother would read books to her siblings out-loud to entertain them; not knowing the power of her words and the synaptic connections she was making. Two of her siblings were in Title I reading and would have homework to read aloud with their mother, so even while Susie was developing in the womb she would hear the spoken words of her mother and her siblings.
 Susie was a full term pregnancy and was born naturally through a vaginal delivery without any medicine being administered during delivery.
All of Susie’s family lived together in the family home she lived in until she was an adult. At the time of delivery there are 5 children (Susie included) and 2 adults, her mother, and father, as well as three family pets, two dogs named Sheba and Tinker and a cat named Missy. The family home is small and everyone in the family sleeps in one bedroom in the loft of their home.
Susie’s mom is her primary caregiver but her oldest brother is very helpful and attentive. Susie’s brother who is 7 years old’s and in the second grade goes to school during the day but helps with the younger children when he is home. Her mom feeds her and meets her needs as they arise. Susie has a pleasant personality and doesn’t cry much. Susie’s family enjoys weekend outings to the beach and picnics sometimes on Saturday’s, attending church on Sunday’s and family dinners on Sunday’s at her grandparents.
 During the week Susie’s father works a lot to support the family, after work he drinks and he passes out and sleeps. Sometimes when her father is drinking he will get angry and hit her mother, her mother ensures that the children are out of the house or quiet somewhere so that they don’t get hit. This does not always work, she is not usually struck but see’s her older siblings hit and hears her father call her mother names and insults.
The entire family speaks English and she lives in a mostly white farming and industrial community in Southern Michigan. Her neighborhood consists of mostly two-parent households with at least 2 children, there are a few elderly neighbors who have already raised their children and will have an influence on the neighborhood kids. Her family identifies as Christian and attends church at least once a week.
The crime rate in Susie’s neighborhood is low and children play outside all day with very little adult supervision. She is not exposed to other languages or cultures. No one that lives in her community speaks a different language, other than English around her, and there are no other races. Her family values education and believes that it is important to be able to read and communicate effectively in English. Other languages never play a role in Susie’s childhood. When she is in high school Spanish speaking people begin to move into the community. Her family is accepting of the new neighbors but believe if they want to live in “our” community they should learn “our” language, and they often make racist comments and microaggressions without realizing it.
Susie’s family values basic education and thinks that it is important for their children to attend basic elementary school. No provisions will be made for higher education and her high school experience will be one of a child who is “not college material.” Susie’s mother only had a formal education until the 7th grade and her father graduated high school in the Marine Corps. Both her father and her mother read a lot of books so she sees this value modeled on a daily basis. The public library is within walking distance of her home and she learns very early to read and write.
When Susie’s siblings are at school and her father is at work her mom takes her and her other preschool-aged siblings to the public library. She got her first library card when she was 4 because she was able to write her name on her own. Her siblings have this same access as well as Title I reading programs in their public schools. There are very few preschool programs in their community and Susie’s mother does not work outside the home, so she stays home during her preschool years. She has paper and crayons in her home and is encouraged to explore the materials available to her.
Her family talks a lot and sometimes uses words that are inappropriate for children but they are still words. Susie and all of her siblings attend kindergarten in a half day public school program. When she is 4 she is not quite old enough for kindergarten; because she has a fall birthday, the kindergarten teacher agrees to test her language and literacy skills to let her attend. Susie is accepted to kindergarten when she is 4 years old. The library becomes important to her and she learns to shelve books as an assistant in her elementary school library in 3rd grade. She shelves books at the public library in 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th grade. When she is in high school she works in the high school library as a student in 11th and 12th grade and then again in college. When Susie is 3 her mom has another baby and then again when she is 4 (this one is stillborn) and yet again when Susie is 6 in elementary school; her baby sister is born with physical and developmental delays.

This makes 7 children in Susie’s family and the youngest is very sick. Her mom and dad need to spend a lot of time at the hospital with their youngest child, so she is left with her older sibling’s a lot and her younger brother who is just a toddler. She read’s to him a lot and play’s with him. Susie’s older siblings, who are still children themselves teach her younger brother how to talk. As Susie’s older siblings get busy with their own learning and pre-teen relationships they become pre-occupied. She becomes a primary caregiver for her younger sibling when she is not at school. When Susie is 9 year’s old her baby sister, who is 3 dies from surgical complications; this is when she decides she wants to be a doctor and help children like her baby sister. She asks for her own bible that year for Christmas. At this point literacy and language plays a huge role in Susie’s life. 

The second part of my research and language and literacy journey I would like to share with you is Susie as a preschooler:

At three and a half years old Susie watches longingly as all of her siblings leave for school. There are very few preschool programs in the community where she lives, and the part-day programs that are available are only for families who can afford to pay. For the first time in her life, Susie is alone with her mother while her father is at work. With so many children Susie’s mother has a huge list of tasks to accomplish before the other children come home from school. Susie follows behind her mother as they head into the kitchen.

            At this age young children have the ability and motivation to sort words and sounds into meaning (Turnbull, 2017). Susie’s mother does not have any formal education so she is not privy to the fact that teachers and parents should converse with children for many hours every day. Due to the fact, her mother is alone most of the time with only children to talk to her she talks to herself (self-talk) and to Susie telling her what she is doing and why she is doing it, without even knowing the benefit it is having on her preschooler’s language and literacy development.

            When they entered the kitchen Susie’s mom put on an apron and she looked at Susie and said, “I’m putting on an apron so I don’t get flour on my shirt. I’m going to make some fried chicken for dinner later, do you want to help?” She looked at her mom and said, “I need apron.” Her mom repeated her statement as a question, “Oh, do you need an apron too? Susie said, “ yes, I need an apron too!” Her mom tied an apron around her middle saying “it is a little big does it work?” Susie smiled and said, “yes, it will work, thank you”.

            Her mom pulled a cookbook out of the drawer and handed it to her. She said “You will have to look up the recipe. I know you can’t read but maybe you can find the picture of the fried chicken.” Susie’s mom had made fried chicken many times and did not need a recipe but she thought this would keep her curious preschooler occupied while she gathered her ingredients. After several minutes Susie shouted with enthusiasm “I got it!” She held up the book and there on the page was a picture of a turkey. Her mom smiled and said “you are so close!” sharing her enthusiasm. You found the poultry section and chickens and turkeys are both poultry. Can you find a chicken recipe? Susie looked back at the book making the connection between the pictures and her mother’s words and she flipped the page.

            There on the next page was a picture of a fancy table with lots of colorful foods and dishes. She said, “momma, there is no chicken, only pootree.” Her mom laughed and looked at the picture and said, “you know what you are right, this is a fancy cookbook!” “Maybe when we go to the library this afternoon we can get a common cookbook.” “Chicken isn’t fancy but it is yummy!” “Maybe we could just make it from scratch?” Susie looked a little confused and said, “but, I’m not itchy.” “No silly, scratch means that you make it from the beginning without a recipe.” “You add a little bit of this, and a little bit of that until it is just right.” “Ok!”, “Let’s do scratch,” she said.

            The ingredients for the recipe are already set out, her mom had prepared them while Susie was busy looking through the book. As Susie climbed up into the chair at the table her mom reached over and turned on the radio to a country music station. Susie and her mother worked together side by side mixing the ingredients together and singing the tunes on the radio. Her mom let her measure the ingredients with a teaspoon and a tablespoon and then she allowed her to mix the ingredients for the breading by hand.

            As a mother, Susie’s mom is doing a very good job of teaching Susie to talk and use language. She is introducing new vocabulary having conversations with Susie and introducing her to using books as resources (American Speech Language Hearing Association, Sept. 29th, 2015). Picture books offer lots of opportunities to learn more advanced vocabulary through scaffolding and fast-mapping (Berger, K. 2015). By giving Susie a cookbook with pictures her mother was encouraging her next steps in her zone of proximal development; introducing her to different types of poultry and new vocabulary and providing her with opportunities for logical extension (Turnbull, 2017).

            As a preschooler Susie is right on track for her language development and even a little advanced in her knowledge of the pragmatics of polite speech and her social understanding. At this point in her development, it would be advantageous for Susie to attend a preschool program. In a preschool program, children learn from teachers, songs, excursions, and other children helping to advance their language acquisition (Berger, K. 2015). In Susie’s home, she has a lot of social interactions with her siblings and her mom is listening, talking and reading to her and not just using words to control her, she is receiving a high-quality early childhood experience from her mother.

            In her culture even though children do not really attend preschool they do attend kindergarten when they are 5 years old. Susie was born in November so she does not meet the kindergarten cut off date when she is ready to go to the school the next year. The public school has a kindergarten assessment that they give students to see if they are ready for school. When Susie is just 4 years old her mom takes her to the public school in July for a kindergarten assessment. At this time she is just 4 and a half unlike, her peers who are already 5 or turning 5 before the school year starts. The kindergarten teacher knows that a lot of development can happen in just 6 months.

            The kindergarten teacher call’s her name and Susie enters the classroom while her mom waits quietly in the hall. She identifies all of her colors and shapes correctly and responds appropriately to all of the questions the kindergarten teacher asks. Despite her young age, Susie will start her formal public education a whole year early.

            Thankfully Susie’s mom recognized the importance of early education and had laid the foundation for her social and emotional development as well as provided her with the language and literacy skills she needed to start school. Susie’s home environment was not idealistic all the time due to the physical abuse she observed and the poverty she was living in, but her mother did an exceptional job of shielding her from the adverse effects and helped to build her resiliency (Center on the Developing Child, 2015). Most early childhood programs are either teacher-directed or child-centered; at home, Susie had the best of both of these programming styles. 

Some questions I would like answered or help that I need with completing this assignment are: Should I focus more on the language and literacy and less on the narrative or does it make it so the reader wants to learn more about this child's outcome? What do most preschools provide that Susie could not get at home? What do you think the long term results would be for Susie if she was placed in an intervention preschool? Vocabulary increases dramatically with thousands of words added between the ages of 2 - 6, how do you think growing up with poverty and abuse will affect Susie's vocabulary? Should I focus more on her vocabulary?